2020 Advisory Opinions Issued

VIRGINIA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ADVISORY COUNCIL
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

ADVISORY OPINIONS ISSUED

2024

Opinion No.	Issue(s)
February
AO-01-24	Discusses the circumstances under which a pro se petitioner becomes eligible to obtain reimbursement of attorney fees after hiring an attorney to represent the petitioner in a FOIA matter or during the appeal process. A court would have to determine that a petitioner's rights and privileges were denied in violation of law, that the petitioner had substantially prevailed on the merits of his case, and that there were no special circumstances that would make the awarding of attorney fees and costs unjust. The court would have to determine the amount of attorney fees and costs that were incurred by a petitioner in the litigation proceedings and award a reimbursement amount accordingly.
AO-02-24	A public body shall not be required to create a new record if the record does not already exist; however, a public body is required to provide to a requester, unless otherwise specifically provided by law, a public record in the medium requested if the public record is identified with reasonable specificity and if that medium is used by the public body in the regular course of business.
AO-03-24	Generally, federal FOIA is limited in that it only applies to federal agencies and does not extend to state agencies. However, some federal laws are worded so that they do apply to other public bodies, including state agencies. FOIA provides that public records must be disclosed except as otherwise specifically provided by law. Therefore, if a federal law provides that disclosure of information is prohibited, and that law is written so that it applies to state agencies, then a state agency would be prohibited from releasing that information and would cite the federal law as the appropriate legal authority when withholding the records in response to a FOIA request.
May
AO-04-24	The exemption for a closed meeting relating to discussion of actual or probable litigation does not require that legal counsel be present at the discussion. Briefings pertaining to actual or probable litigation may be performed by staff members or consultants. Conversely, the exemption for a closed meeting pertaining to consultation with legal counsel employed or retained by a public body regarding specific legal matters does require that legal counsel be present accordingly. Public notice of a special, emergency, or continued meeting must be reasonable under the circumstances and shall be given contemporaneously with the notice being provided to the members of the public body conducting the meeting.