| 
                     
                      |  | VIRGINIA 
                          FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 
                          ADVISORY COUNCILCOMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
 |  AO-21-03
 July 
                    21, 2003 Mr. Arnold 
                    ThielenPresident, MIXNET Corporation
 Fairfax, Virginia
 The 
                    staff of the Freedom of Information Advisory Council is authorized 
                    to issue advisory opinions. The ensuing staff advisory opinion 
                    is based solely upon the information presented in your correspondence 
                    of June 17, 2003. Dear 
                    Mr. Thielen:  You 
                    have asked two questions relating to access to court records 
                    under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). First, 
                    you ask if a clerk of a circuit court would be required to 
                    provide digital copies of its digital databases of land conveyance 
                    documents or other court records not sealed by the court or 
                    subject to an exemption. Secondly, you ask if the clerk of 
                    the court may only offer paper copies at 50 cents each in 
                    lieu of digital copies of the real estate transfer records 
                    when the request is made for the digital index and associated 
                    digital images. The Virginia 
                    Freedom of Information Advisory Council has specifically addressed 
                    your first question in a prior opinion.1 Subsection A of § 
                    2.2-3704 of the Code of Virginia states that [e]xcept as 
                    otherwise specifically provided by law, all public records 
                    shall be open to inspection and copying. Section 2.2-3701 
                    defines a public body as any legislative body, authority, 
                    board, bureau, commission, district or agency of the Commonwealth 
                    or of any political subdivision of the Commonwealth, including 
                    cities, towns and counties, municipal councils, governing 
                    bodies of counties, school boards and planning commissions; 
                    boards of visitors of public institutions; and other organizations, 
                    corporations or agencies in the Commonwealth supported wholly 
                    or principally by public funds. (Emphasis added.) 
                    The Office of the Attorney General of Virginia has found that 
                    this definition includes a circuit court as an agency of the 
                    state supported wholly or principally by public funds.2 In 
                    addition to falling under the definition of a public body 
                    in FOIA, § 17.1-208 states that [e]xcept as otherwise 
                    provided by law, the records and papers of every circuit court 
                    shall be open to inspection by any person and the clerk shall, 
                    when required, furnish copies thereof, except in cases in 
                    which it is otherwise specifically provided.  FOIA 
                    defines a public record at § 2.2-3701 as all writings 
                    and recordings...set down by handwriting, typewriting, printing, 
                    photostatting, photography, magnetic impulse, optical or magneto-optical 
                    form, mechanical or electronic recording or other form of 
                    data compilation, however stored, and regardless of physical 
                    form or characteristics, prepared or owned by, or in the possession 
                    of a public body or its officers, employees or agents in the 
                    transaction of public business. More specifically, subsection 
                    G of § 2.2-3704 states that [p]ublic records maintained 
                    by a public body in an electronic data processing system, 
                    computer database, or any other structured collection of data 
                    shall be made available to a requester. Furthermore, the 
                    section explicitly states that if a database contains exempt 
                    and nonexempt information, the public body must provide access 
                    to the nonexempt portions. Based upon these statutes, it makes 
                    no difference for purposes of FOIA whether a public record 
                    is a sheet of paper or a computer file -- either must be released 
                    upon request, unless specifically exempt by law.3   Subsection 
                    G of § 2.2-3704 states that [p]ublic bodies shall 
                    produce nonexempt records maintained in an electronic database 
                    in any tangible medium identified by the requester...if that 
                    medium is used by the public body in the regular course of 
                    business. Thus, because the records are already maintained 
                    in a digital format, a requester would have the right to receive 
                    a copy of the records in the digital format. Likewise, a requester 
                    would also have the right to request a paper copy of the records 
                    maintained in the database. It is not, however, within the 
                    discretion of the clerk of the court to only offer the option 
                    of receiving paper copies of the records if the records already 
                    exist in digital format; the choice of the format lies with 
                    the requester.  Subdivision 
                    A 8 of § 17.1-275, relating to fees collected by clerks 
                    of circuit courts for various services, indicates that a clerk 
                    shall charges a fee of 50 cents per page [f]or making out 
                    a copy of any paper or record to go out of the office. 
                    However, this provision has little relevance to electronic 
                    or digital records that may be requested from the clerk. A 
                    digital database is not identified by the number of pages 
                    it contains; instead, a digital database is a set of data 
                    that may be copied and transferred from one computer to a 
                    computer disk or other storage medium. In providing digital 
                    records, a clerk would be required to comply with subsection 
                    G of § 2.2-3704, which requires that records in an electronic 
                    database shall be made available to a requester at a reasonable 
                    cost, not to exceed the actual cost in accordance with subsection 
                    F. Subsection F of § 2.2-3704 allows a public body 
                    to recoup its actual costs incurred in accessing, duplicating, 
                    supplying, or searching for the requested records. Therefore, 
                    if you request a digital copy of records maintained in a digital 
                    database, the clerk of the court may charge you for the time 
                    it takes to access and copy the nonexempt portions of the 
                    database that you requested, and for any other incidental, 
                    actual costs, such as the cost of the computer disk onto which 
                    the records are copied. Thank 
                    you for contacting this office. I hope that I have been of 
                    assistance.
  Sincerely,  Maria 
                    J.K. EverettExecutive Director
 
 1 
                    See 
                    Virginia Freedom of Information Advisory Opinion 11 (2002).2 
                    1981-82 
                    Op. Atty. Gen. Va. 60. A number of other opinions, while not 
                    specifically addressing the issue, are based upon the assumption 
                    that court records are open to public inspection pursuant 
                    to FOIA. See, e.g., 2000 Op. Atty. Gen. Va. 94; 2000 Va. AG 
                    LEXIS 54 (No. 00-058, Sept. 27, 2000), 1987 Op. Atty. Va. 
                    255, 1984-85 Op. Atty. Gen. Va. 428, 1982-1983 Op. Atty. Gen. 
                    723, and 1982-83 Op. Atty. Gen. Va. 709.
 3 
                    See 
                    also 2002 Op. Atty. Gen. Va. 9; 2002 Va. AG LEXIS 159 (No. 
                    02-095, December 19, 2002), holding that all court records, 
                    whether in digital or paper format, are subject to disclosure 
                    under FOIA unless sealed by a court or otherwise exempt from 
                    disclosure by law.
 |