|
VIRGINIA
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ADVISORY COUNCIL
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
|
AO-21-03
July
21, 2003
Mr. Arnold
Thielen
President, MIXNET Corporation
Fairfax, Virginia
The
staff of the Freedom of Information Advisory Council is authorized
to issue advisory opinions. The ensuing staff advisory opinion
is based solely upon the information presented in your correspondence
of June 17, 2003.
Dear
Mr. Thielen:
You
have asked two questions relating to access to court records
under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). First,
you ask if a clerk of a circuit court would be required to
provide digital copies of its digital databases of land conveyance
documents or other court records not sealed by the court or
subject to an exemption. Secondly, you ask if the clerk of
the court may only offer paper copies at 50 cents each in
lieu of digital copies of the real estate transfer records
when the request is made for the digital index and associated
digital images.
The Virginia
Freedom of Information Advisory Council has specifically addressed
your first question in a prior opinion.1 Subsection A of §
2.2-3704 of the Code of Virginia states that [e]xcept as
otherwise specifically provided by law, all public records
shall be open to inspection and copying. Section 2.2-3701
defines a public body as any legislative body, authority,
board, bureau, commission, district or agency of the Commonwealth
or of any political subdivision of the Commonwealth, including
cities, towns and counties, municipal councils, governing
bodies of counties, school boards and planning commissions;
boards of visitors of public institutions; and other organizations,
corporations or agencies in the Commonwealth supported wholly
or principally by public funds. (Emphasis added.)
The Office of the Attorney General of Virginia has found that
this definition includes a circuit court as an agency of the
state supported wholly or principally by public funds.2 In
addition to falling under the definition of a public body
in FOIA, § 17.1-208 states that [e]xcept as otherwise
provided by law, the records and papers of every circuit court
shall be open to inspection by any person and the clerk shall,
when required, furnish copies thereof, except in cases in
which it is otherwise specifically provided.
FOIA
defines a public record at § 2.2-3701 as all writings
and recordings...set down by handwriting, typewriting, printing,
photostatting, photography, magnetic impulse, optical or magneto-optical
form, mechanical or electronic recording or other form of
data compilation, however stored, and regardless of physical
form or characteristics, prepared or owned by, or in the possession
of a public body or its officers, employees or agents in the
transaction of public business. More specifically, subsection
G of § 2.2-3704 states that [p]ublic records maintained
by a public body in an electronic data processing system,
computer database, or any other structured collection of data
shall be made available to a requester. Furthermore, the
section explicitly states that if a database contains exempt
and nonexempt information, the public body must provide access
to the nonexempt portions. Based upon these statutes, it makes
no difference for purposes of FOIA whether a public record
is a sheet of paper or a computer file -- either must be released
upon request, unless specifically exempt by law.3
Subsection
G of § 2.2-3704 states that [p]ublic bodies shall
produce nonexempt records maintained in an electronic database
in any tangible medium identified by the requester...if that
medium is used by the public body in the regular course of
business. Thus, because the records are already maintained
in a digital format, a requester would have the right to receive
a copy of the records in the digital format. Likewise, a requester
would also have the right to request a paper copy of the records
maintained in the database. It is not, however, within the
discretion of the clerk of the court to only offer the option
of receiving paper copies of the records if the records already
exist in digital format; the choice of the format lies with
the requester.
Subdivision
A 8 of § 17.1-275, relating to fees collected by clerks
of circuit courts for various services, indicates that a clerk
shall charges a fee of 50 cents per page [f]or making out
a copy of any paper or record to go out of the office.
However, this provision has little relevance to electronic
or digital records that may be requested from the clerk. A
digital database is not identified by the number of pages
it contains; instead, a digital database is a set of data
that may be copied and transferred from one computer to a
computer disk or other storage medium. In providing digital
records, a clerk would be required to comply with subsection
G of § 2.2-3704, which requires that records in an electronic
database shall be made available to a requester at a reasonable
cost, not to exceed the actual cost in accordance with subsection
F. Subsection F of § 2.2-3704 allows a public body
to recoup its actual costs incurred in accessing, duplicating,
supplying, or searching for the requested records. Therefore,
if you request a digital copy of records maintained in a digital
database, the clerk of the court may charge you for the time
it takes to access and copy the nonexempt portions of the
database that you requested, and for any other incidental,
actual costs, such as the cost of the computer disk onto which
the records are copied.
Thank
you for contacting this office. I hope that I have been of
assistance.
Sincerely,
Maria
J.K. Everett
Executive Director
1
See
Virginia Freedom of Information Advisory Opinion 11 (2002).
2
1981-82
Op. Atty. Gen. Va. 60. A number of other opinions, while not
specifically addressing the issue, are based upon the assumption
that court records are open to public inspection pursuant
to FOIA. See, e.g., 2000 Op. Atty. Gen. Va. 94; 2000 Va. AG
LEXIS 54 (No. 00-058, Sept. 27, 2000), 1987 Op. Atty. Va.
255, 1984-85 Op. Atty. Gen. Va. 428, 1982-1983 Op. Atty. Gen.
723, and 1982-83 Op. Atty. Gen. Va. 709.
3
See
also 2002 Op. Atty. Gen. Va. 9; 2002 Va. AG LEXIS 159 (No.
02-095, December 19, 2002), holding that all court records,
whether in digital or paper format, are subject to disclosure
under FOIA unless sealed by a court or otherwise exempt from
disclosure by law.
|