|
VIRGINIA
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ADVISORY COUNCIL
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
|
AO-40-01
August
23, 2001
Mr. Harry M. Lantz
Mountvale, Virginia
The staff of
the Freedom of Information Advisory Council is authorized
to issue advisory opinions. The ensuing staff advisory opinion
is based solely upon the information presented in your telephone
conversation of June 18, 2001.
Dear Mr. Lantz:
You have asked a
question concerning the meetings of a public body under the
Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). You indicate that
prior to regularly scheduled meetings of your local board
of supervisors ("the Board"), four or five members gather
beforehand for discussions. When you try to attend these pre-meeting
sessions, you state that the members tell you that you must
leave. You ask generally what requirements FOIA imposes upon
the Board relating to such behavior.
Section 2.1-341
of the Code of Virginia defines "meetings" as the meetings
including work sessions, when sitting physically, or through
telephonic or video equipment pursuant to § 2.1-343.1, as
a body or entity, or as an informal assemblage of (i) as many
as three members or (ii) a quorum, if less than three, of
the constituent membership, wherever held, with or without
minutes being taken, whether or not votes are cast, of any
public body. Furthermore, the policy of FOIA found at
§ 2.1-340.1 states that FOIA ensures the people of the
Commonwealth ... free entry to meetings of public bodies wherein
the business of the public is being conducted. Subsection
A of § 2.1-343 requires that all meetings of public bodies
be open, unless specifically exempted by § 2.1-344.
As can be seen from
the definition of a meeting, a gathering of four or five members
of the Board falls under the definition of a meeting. If the
members are discussing matters of public business, than such
a gathering is not permitted under FOIA unless the proper
procedures set forth at § 2.1-343 are followed; specifically,
the meeting must be open to the public, proper notice must
be given, and minutes must be recorded. Any gathering that
falls under the definition of a meeting may only be closed
to the public if the subject of discussion falls under one
of the exemptions set forth in § 2.1-344. If the meeting is
the proper subject of an exemption, then the procedures set
forth at § 2.1-344.1 must be followed in order to convene
in a proper closed session, including making a motion to go
into closed session that identifies the purpose and subject
of the closed session and provides the specific statutory
exemption, and reconvening in open meeting to certify the
proceedings.
Please note, however,
that FOIA does allow members of a public body to gather and
discuss issues not related to the public business without
invoking the requirements of FOIA. Subsection G of § 2.1-343
states that [n]othing in [FOIA] shall be construed to prohibit
the gathering or attendance of two or more members of a public
body at any place or function where no part of the purpose
of the gathering or attendance is the discussion or transaction
of any public business, and such gathering or attendance was
not called or prearranged with any purpose of discussing or
transacting any business of the public body. Thus, it
would not be a violation of FOIA for members of the Board
to gather and discuss issues unrelated to the public business
of the county prior to a Board meeting, and there would be
no requirement that such a discussion be open to the public.
In conclusion, even
an informal gathering of three or more members of a public
body constitutes a meeting for the purposes of FOIA when public
business is discussed. Such a gathering is prohibited by FOIA
unless it is open to the public, notice is given, and minutes
are taken, or properly closed pursuant to the procedures set
forth for closed meetings at § 2.1-344.1.
Thank you for contacting
this office. I hope that I have been of assistance.
Sincerely,
Maria J.K. Everett
Executive Director
|