| 
                     
                      |  | VIRGINIA 
                          FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 
                          ADVISORY COUNCILCOMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
 |  AO-05-06
 May 
                    25, 2006 John 
                    FenterVirginia Beach, Virginia
  The 
                    staff of the Freedom of Information Advisory Council is authorized 
                    to issue advisory opinions. The ensuing staff advisory opinion 
                    is based solely upon the information presented in your correspondence 
                    received April 28, 2006 and electronic mail dated May 8, 2006. Dear Mr. Fenter:  You have asked whether the Norfolk International 
                    Airport Authority (the Authority) has failed to respond in 
                    the time and manner required by the Virginia Freedom of Information 
                    Act (FOIA) to certain requests for records. The facts regarding 
                    this situation are set forth below, based upon the copies 
                    of the request and response letters which you provided.  Your 
                    initial request, made by letter dated March 8, 2006, requested 
                    from the Authority a copy of any Federal or Virginia statute 
                    or regulation authorizing the Airport Authority to search 
                    any vehicle on airport property, outside the Federal "sterile 
                    area," without prior probable cause or a valid search 
                    warrant issued by a Federal or Virginia court. The Executive 
                    Director of the Authority replied by letter dated March 10, 
                    2006, and indicated that your request had been forwarded to 
                    the Authority's legal counsel for response. Counsel for the 
                    Authority (Counsel) denied your request by letter dated March 
                    15, 2006, stating that your request was in substance, 
                    a request for legal advice and/or legal research, and [FOIA] 
                    is not applicable. Counsel's letter also cited 49 C.F.R. 
                    § 1520, after stating that both federal and state 
                    law prohibit the release of sensitive security information. 
                    Counsel suggested you contact the Transportation Security 
                    Administration for more information.  In a subsequent letter addressed to the 
                    Executive Director dated March 21, 2006, you indicated that 
                    the March 15, 2006, response letter from Counsel was not responsive 
                    to your FOIA request, and that you believed your rights under 
                    FOIA had been violated. You concluded your letter of March 
                    21, 2006, with a reiteration and clarification of your FOIA 
                    request in the following language: Please 
                    provide me with any records held by your authority regarding: 1. 
                    The history or circumstances relating to the erection of the 
                    Norfolk Airport Authority signs on the access roads to the 
                    Norfolk International Airport stating that "All vehicles 
                    entering airport are subject to search." 2. 
                    Any federal or Commonwealth of Virginia statute or regulation 
                    authorizing the Norfolk Airport Authority, the Norfolk Airport 
                    Police, or any other entity associated with the Norfolk Airport 
                    International Airport to establish a policy that all vehicles 
                    entering the airport are subject to search. You also requested prior notification if 
                    the estimated cost of providing these records would exceed 
                    $30. In a reply letter dated March 27, 2006, Counsel indicated 
                    that a response would be sent to you after the Authority received 
                    advice from the Transportation Security Administration. It 
                    appears that as of May 8, 2006, you have received no further 
                    reply from the Authority regarding this request.  The 
                    policy of FOIA, set forth by the General Assembly in § 
                    2.2-3701, is to ensure the people of the Commonwealth 
                    ready access to public records in the custody of a public 
                    body or its officers and employees....Unless a public body 
                    or its officers or employees specifically elect to exercise 
                    an exemption provided by this chapter or any other statute...all 
                    public records shall be available for inspection and copying 
                    upon request. FOIA further provides in § 2.2-3704 
                    that [e]xcept as otherwise specifically provided by law, 
                    all public records shall be open to inspection and copying 
                    by any citizens of the Commonwealth during the regular office 
                    hours of the custodian of such records.   In considering 
                    any records request, the initial step is to determine whether 
                    the records sought are public records subject to 
                    FOIA. Public records are defined in § 2.2-3701 
                    to include any record, regardless of physical form or 
                    characteristics, prepared or owned by, or in the possession 
                    of a public body or its officers, employees or agents in the 
                    transaction of public business. Your request of March 
                    8, 2006, and your second enumerated request of March 21, 2006, 
                    both asked for any federal or Virginia statute or regulation 
                    authorizing certain searches to be conducted by the Authority. 
                    While the Authority could choose to provide such information, 
                    the opinion of this office is that such a request is not a 
                    request for public records as contemplated by FOIA. 
                    Statutes and regulations are publicly available through numerous 
                    other sources.1 In Virginia, all statutes and regulations are 
                    published and publicly available, pursuant to laws outside 
                    of FOIA, such as the Administrative Process Act, Ch. 40 of 
                    Title 2.2, and the enabling statute for the Virginia Code 
                    Commission, Ch. 15 of Title 30. The Virginia Code Commission 
                    has the specific statutory duty to publish the Code of Virginia, 
                    the Virginia Administrative Code, and the Register of Regulations.2 
                    It is not the responsibility of other public bodies to provide 
                    copies of these statutes and regulations, although many choose 
                    to do so. For example, this office publishes a copy of FOIA 
                    on its website, and we are happy to provide paper copies of 
                    FOIA upon request as well. Similarly, the Authority could 
                    choose to provide copies of statutes and regulations relevant 
                    to its work, but FOIA does not require it to do so.   While 
                    your request for statutes and regulations is not a request 
                    governed by FOIA, your other request from your letter of March 
                    21, 2006, does request public records subject to 
                    FOIA. That request asks for any records regarding the history 
                    or circumstances relating to the posting of certain signs 
                    by the Authority. That request therefore encompasses records 
                    such as meeting minutes, memoranda, work orders, receipts, 
                    or other records concerning the posting of the signs, all 
                    of which fall within the definition of public records 
                    (although exemptions may still apply). As such, the Authority 
                    should have provided you with one of the four responses permitted 
                    under § 2.2-3704 within five working days of the receipt 
                    of your request: (1) provide the records; (2) deny your request 
                    in writing, citing the appropriate exemption(s) that allow 
                    the Authority to withhold the records; (3) provide the request 
                    records in part and deny your request in part, again citing 
                    the appropriate exemption(s) in writing that allow portions 
                    of the request to be withheld; or (4) inform you in writing 
                    that the Authority needed an additional seven working days 
                    to respond. If the public body needs more than the additional 
                    seven working days to respond, FOIA requires the public body 
                    to make reasonable efforts to reach an agreement with you, 
                    the requester, concerning the production of records. If no 
                    agreement is reached, the public body may then petition a 
                    court for additional time to respond.   Based upon the correspondence you provided, 
                    it appears that your request letter was dated Tuesday, March 
                    21, 2006 and the response to that letter was dated Monday, 
                    March 27, 2006. While it is not known precisely when the Authority 
                    received that request, it appears that the response was sent 
                    within the five working days allowed by FOIA.3 However, the 
                    response itself was not one of the four responses permitted 
                    by FOIA. In the response, the Authority acknowledged receipt 
                    of your request and stated that the Authority would respond 
                    further after receiving advice from the Transportation Security 
                    Administration. The Authority did not provide the requested 
                    records, did not deny your request pursuant to an exemption, 
                    and did not invoke the additional seven working days to respond 
                    allowed under FOIA. Additionally, based upon your correspondence, 
                    it appears that the Authority did not attempt to reach an 
                    agreement with you concerning the production of the requested 
                    records, and did not petition a court for additional time 
                    to respond. Based upon your electronic mail of May 8, 2006, 
                    it appears that as of that date, the Authority has not supplemented 
                    its response. Thus, in regard to this request for records 
                    regarding the history and circumstances of the signs, it appears 
                    that the Authority has failed to comply with the procedure 
                    for responding to requests as mandated by FOIA.   Thank 
                    you for contacting this office. I hope that I have been of 
                    assistance.   Sincerely,  Maria J.K. EverettExecutive Director
  1For 
                    example, statutes are published in the Acts of Assembly, as 
                    well as in the Code of Virginia. Regulations are published 
                    in the Virginia Administrative Code. Printed versions of these 
                    resources are available at many libraries, including court 
                    libraries, law school libraries, and the Virginia Legislative 
                    Reference Center. Both the Code of Virginia and the Virginia 
                    Administrative Code are also available online through the 
                    Legislative Information System at http://lis.virginia.gov. 
                    2See Code of Virginia § 30-146.
 3If the request was received the same day it was 
                    dated, Tuesday, March 21, 2006, then the fifth and final day 
                    to respond would have been Tuesday, March 28, 2006. Presuming 
                    that the response was sent on the day it was dated, March 
                    27, 2006, it was therefore sent within the five working day 
                    time limit.
 |